[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <465EDCF4.7010700@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:34:28 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@...uxpower.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Document the hotplug code is incompatible with x86
irq handling
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I just realized that except for doing the code review and noticing
> that the current cpu hotplug code is fundamentally incompatible
> with x86 I haven't done anything about it. So here is my patch
> to document what is wrong.
>
> The current cpu hotplug code requires irqs to be migrated from a cpu
> outside of irq context. On x86 ioapics simply do not support this,
> making the code unfixable without major redesign of the generic cpu
> hotplug code.
>
> So this patch makes CPU_HOTPLUG on x86 depend on CONFIG_BROKEN
> and adds a WARN_ON so people that do enable it are not in doubt about
> which part of the code is broken, even if it does work for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
I don't think this is useful, though the code may be problematic, this
patch will break suspend on all SMP machines with an existing config,
which is a major regression..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists