[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070531105842.0728f577.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:58:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Per-container pages reclamation
On Thu, 31 May 2007 14:35:43 +0400
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> > Would I be correct in guessing that pages which are on the
> > per-rss-container lists are also eligible for reclaim off the traditional
> > page LRUs? If so, how does that work? When a page gets freed off the
>
> Yes. All the pages are accessible from booth - global and per-container
> LRU lists and reclamation can be performed from booth.
>
> > per-zone LRUs does it also get removed from the per-rss_container LRU? But
> > how can this be right?
>
> I don't get your idea here.
If we have a page which is on the zone LRU with refcount=1 and someone does
put_page() on it, we will take that page off the zone LRU and then actually
free the page.
I am assuming that your patches change that logic so that we will also
remove that page from the per-container LRU at the same time?
If so, the problem which I see is that, under rare circumstances, that
final put_page() will occur from interrupt context. Hence we would be
trying to remove the page from the per-container LRU at interrupt time.
But the locks which you have in there are not suited for taking from
interrupt context.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists