linux-kernel - Re: section mismatches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070531205326.GH27305@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 22:53:26 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: section mismatches

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:56:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:50:33 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> 
> > Is it correct assumed that start_kernel() is never called in the HOTPLUG case since we
> > are dealign with CPU #2 and more?
> 
> start_kernel is called once, on the boot CPU, before the other CPUs are
> brought up.
As expectyed - thanks.
I'm buried in section mismatch warnings at the moment but will come back to this
one a bit later. This needs a bit more careful thinking.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/