[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180652972.25067.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:09:32 +0100
From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...x01.hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
John Belmonte <john@...gie.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Add INPUT support to toshiba_acpi
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 18:46 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> HCI_EMPTY is *by far* the most frequent state to occur I think
> (users won't press keys all the time), thus it's probably better(?)
> for branch prediction to have this placed first, right?
> Not that it matters too much instruction-wise, but still...
Sure.
> Apart from that I'm very happy to see progress on this front
> (speaking as a "proud" owner of an old Toshiba notebook requiring
> this stuff).
Good - this stuff should just work :-)
> And I'd definitely move the multiple identical "Re-enabled hotkeys" parts
> into one single non-inlined(!) function for the same reason.
> Not to mention that it's BUTT UGLY to have the *same* fat
> multi-line comment duplicated bazillion times.
Agree. New patch (untested) attached.
Thanks for review,
Richard.
View attachment "toshiba_acpi_add_buttons_05.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (9216 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists