[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18014.5474.664638.694584@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:22:58 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Stefan Bader <Stefan.Bader@...ibm.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems,
and dm/md.
On Tuesday May 29, psusi@....rr.com wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
> > md/dm modules could keep count of requests as has been suggested
> > (though that would be a fairly big change for raid0 as it currently
> > doesn't know when a request completes - bi_endio goes directly to the
> > filesystem).
>
> Are you sure? I believe that dm handles bi_endio because it waits for
> all in progress bio to complete before switching tables.
I was taking about md/raid0, not dm-stripe.
md/raid0 (and md/linear) currently never know that a request has
completed.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists