lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 06:43:14 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:31:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Luck, Tony wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > `.exit.text' referenced in section `.init.text' of drivers/built-in.o: 
> > > defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/built-in.o
> > 
> > 
> > This one is a fatal error ... the code is trying to call a function
> > that has been marked __exit in a driver that has been built-in, instead
> > of as a module.  Since a builtin driver can never be unloaded, the kernel
> > has thrown away all the __exit routines (at link time).
> > 
> > The error message appears less than helpful in tracking down which
> > routine in which driver is the problem though.
> 
> Right. I have no idea where to look. The function has no name? Or is the 
> segment .exit.text referenced by namne in .init.text?
Unfortunately modpost does not alows know how to resolve symbol names
from addresses. Lately it has been improves by adding support for 
addends in ELF. But that is beyond my ELF knowledge atm so
I cannot improve it.

What you can do (apart from the cscope trick as Randy suggest) is
to run modpost manual on all .o files in drivers/

If the cross reference happens in a single .o file you will get
a hit there.
And if it is say in scsi then you will get a hit in scsi/built-in.o

Hope this helps.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ