[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070531060938.GK3429@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:09:38 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
John Levon <levon@...ementarian.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, davej@...hat.com, ak@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH][OPROFILE] x86: Use for_each_possible_cpu to allocate
msrs (was [PATCH] x86: fix oprofile double free (was Re: Multiple
free during oprofile unload))
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (acme@...hat.com) wrote:
> The fix for the fix needed a fix: allocate_msrs() was using
> for_each_online_cpu(), but nmi_setup uses for_each_possible_cpu(), and
> in my test machine, a Dell Poweredge 1950 I have 2 dual core Xeons,
> which makes for 4 possible cores, but wait, they are HT capable, so...
>
> [acme@...a linux-2.6.21.3.orig]$ dmesg | grep Allowing
> SMP: Allowing 8 CPUs, 4 hotplug CPUs
> [acme@...a linux-2.6.21.3.orig]$
>
> We have 8 possible CPUs, but only 4 online, b00m. Fix it by making
> allocate_msrs agree with nmi_setup, i.e. make both use
> for_each_possible_cpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Thanks Arnaldo. I noticed this earlier, but mistakenly didn't consider it
an issue aside of code needing to be cleaned up and for hotplug (which I
thought was already broken for other reasons). And the Opteron I tested
on has possible == online. I tested this addition on both the AMD box,
as well as an Intel box with possible > online. All looks good.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists