linux-kernel - Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070601161111.GM11166@waste.org>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:11:11 -0500
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"K.R. Foley" <kr@...sft.com>, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * K.R. Foley <kr@...sft.com> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * K.R. Foley <kr@...sft.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Ingo,
> > >>
> > >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 
> > >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
> > > 
> > > yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
> > > 
> > > 	Ingo
> > > 
> > 
> > So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit 
> > differently than previous versions. Sorry.
> 
> yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3 
> - but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have 
> a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all.

Including 2.6.21.3 in your patch will break ketchup.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/