lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706010955390.3957@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Gregor Jasny <gjasny@...glemail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.22-rc3



On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> I'm about to dive into some heads-down RHEL backporting (whee), so I cannot
> look at the code in depth this weekend, but here are my basic thoughts:
> 
> * We knew there would be fallout from the new reset-sequence code, and this is
> clearly in that category.
> 
> * It worked before #reset-seq merge AFAICT, which implies the old method of
> probing -- which included SRST -- worked.

Well, I don't think it really "worked" before. It apparently always had a 
bad 30-second timeout (probably because the reset just didn't work at 
all). It's just that the old code didn't care, and since the identify then 
worked, it was all good.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ