linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <466054C1.3040100@sandeen.net>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:53 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

Andrew Morton wrote:

> Recursive lock_kernel() is OK.

Oh, it is?  Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a 
good thing.... :)

Ok, let me look into it further.  I changed lock_kernel to 
udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always 
immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it.  I'll investigate 
further.

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/