linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070601182010.GE8398@cvg>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:20:10 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:51:34PM -0500]
| Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| >[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500]
| >| Andrew Morton wrote:
| >| 
| >| >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK.
| >| 
| >| Oh, it is?  Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a 
| >| good thing.... :)
| >| 
| >| Ok, let me look into it further.  I changed lock_kernel to 
| >| udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always 
| >| immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it.  I'll investigate 
| >| further.
| >| 
| >| -Eric
| >| 
| >
| >Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module
| >instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)
| 
| Not if it's  already built in (at least not with more hackery than it's 
| worth...) - just rebuild your kernel w/ udf as a module.
| 
| BTW my testcase before was bogus, that's not what's causing the lockup. 
|  I'll keep investigating now that I know what *not* to look for. ;-)
| 
| -Eric
| 

Eric, could you try this

		Cyrill

View attachment "att-01.diff" of type "text/plain" (507 bytes)