linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070601182835.GC16529@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:28:35 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:14 -0400
 > Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > >  > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
 > >  > 
 > >  > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
 > >  > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
 > >  > +
 > >  > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
 > >  > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
 > >  > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
 > > 
 > > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
 > 
 > What, no Tested-by: ?

Heh. Indeed.  I think there's room for both fwiw.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/