[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46607EEF.8080602@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:17:51 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>
CC: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: new exception handling (hotplug, NCQ framework)
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Jeff Garzik schrieb:
>> Below is a refresh of my on-going effort to convert sata_mv to the new
>> exception handling framework. sata_mv is one of the last hold-outs, and
>> its old-EH implementation blocks new features like hotplug and NCQ.
>>
>> It works for me on the one 50xx and one 60xx card I tested it on, but
>> other testers reported regressions, which is why it is not yet upstream.
>
> Hi,
>
> If I'm correct, this patch won't make to 2.6.22, and the first possible
> inclusion would be 2.6.23?
Correct... if that. No guarantee it will make 2.6.23 either, since it
is low priority :(
> Could you summarize what other regressions were reported? I can't find
> much information about sata_mv regressiobs on linux-ide list (at least
> when looking at the subjects: lots of patches from you, and two reports
> from me).
Dave Dillow and dean gaudet responded with reports that the
BUG_ON/WARN_ON traps in would trigger:
WARNING: at drivers/ata/sata_mv.c:1287 mv_qc_issue()
and
WARNING: at drivers/ata/sata_mv.c:1333 mv_get_crpb_status()
which leads me to think that my sata_mv new-EH patches are accidentally
turning on NCQ mode.
I have a feeling that I will be able to reproduce this once I attach an
NCQ-capable drive and re-test on my own systems, but again, haven't
found the time :/
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists