linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.22 libata spindown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4660841D.5050003@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:39:57 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 libata spindown

Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> I'm still seeing the libata warning that disks were not spun down
> properly on the following two setups and am wondering whether I need
> a new shutdown binary or the changeset mentioned below is not meant
> to fix what I'm triggering by halt'ing.
> 
> If it's not a bug I will try to update my shutdown utility and if
> that does not work I promise not to bother lkml about a problem
> caused by my userland. If it is a bug I hope it will be of interest
> for 2.6.22 bug tracking.
> 
> Setup 1:
> SATA 1 Disks
> AMD64 3200+
> nVidia nForce 3 250 (Ultra?)
> Debian i386 Unstable
> 
> Setup 2:
> SATA 2 disks
> Core 2 Duo E6600
> Intel 975X
> Debian x86_64 Unstable
> 
> Just to be clear what warning I'm talking about:
> DISK MIGHT NOT BE SPUN DOWN PROPERLY. UPDATE SHUTDOWN UTILITY
> For more info, visit http://linux-ata.org/shutdown.html


IIRC, Debian was the one OS that really did need a shutdown utility 
update, as the message says :)

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/