[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466087CF.70708@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:55:43 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> ....
> +Field name: hardware_subarch
> +Type: write
> +Offset/size: 0x23c/4
> +Protocol: 2.07+
> +
> + In a paravirtualized environment the hardware low level architectural
> + pieces such as interrupt handling, page table handling, and
> + accessing process control registers needs to be done differently.
> +
> + This field allows the bootloader to inform the kernel we are in one
> + one of those environments.
> +
> + 0x00000000 The default x86/PC environment
> + 0x00000001 lguest
> + 0x00000002 Xen
> +
> +Field name: hardware_subarch_data
> +Type: write
> +Offset/size: 0x23c/8
>
offset = 240
> +Protocol: 2.07+
> +
> + A pointer to data that is specific to hardware subarch
>
Do we care particularly? If 8 bytes is enough for the subarch, do we
care whether its a pointer or literal? After all, this is just a private
channel between the bootloader and some subarch-specific piece of code
in the kernel.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists