[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3fy5b5nrt.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:10:46 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: "Scott Preece" <sepreece@...il.com>
Cc: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
"Scott Preece" <sepreece@...il.com> writes:
> This is a question worth answering - is it rude to ack/nak a patch if
> you're not a maintainer or otherwise known-to-be-trusted, or is it OK
> for anyone to express an opinion? Andrew's patch text seems to imply
> that it's generally OK.
Every pair of eyes (or a single one) looking at the patch in question
is a good thing. I can't imagine why would one want to look at the
code if he/she can't ack or nak or otherwise comment it.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists