[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465F8369.8090501@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:24:41 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 23:01:15 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc3/2.6.22-rc3-mm1/
>>>
>>> - Merged the convert-cpusets-to-container-infrastructure patches. These
>>> will probably be dropped and redone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> <BIG SNIP>
>>
>>> x86 things
>>>
>>> +add-select-phylib-to-the-ucc_geth-kconfig-option.patch
>>> +m68k-parenthesis-balance.patch
>>> +msi-fix-the-ordering-of-msix-irqs.patch
>>> +msi-mask-the-msix-vector-before-we-unmap-it.patch
>>> +potential-parse-error-in-ifdef.patch
>>> +potential-parse-error-in-ifdef-fix.patch
>>> +potential-parse-error-in-ifdef-update.patch
>>> +pci_ids-update-patch-for-intel-ich9m.patch
>>> +x86-fix-oprofile-double-free-was-re-multiple-free.patch
>>>
>>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/565 fixes the above patch :-)
>>
>>
>
> I don't know what you mean. The code is already using
> for_each_possible_cpu() and
> x86-fix-oprofile-double-free-was-re-multiple-free.patch doesn't change
> that.
>
>
Yes, the code, i.e. nmi_setup already uses for_each_possible_cpu(), that
is not the problem. The problem is allocate_msr doing a
for_each_online_cpu(), i.e. not allocating for each_possible_cpu. Chris
tested and acked the patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/31/36
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists