[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6278d2220706011616k4c0950b0s7155f569935b6e60@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:16:47 +0100
From: "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To: "Matthew Fredrickson" <creslin@...ium.com>
Cc: "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Device Driver Etiquette
On 1 Jun, 19:40, "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Matthew Fredrickson <creslin@...ium.com> wrote:
>
> > is it acceptable (although
> > not nice) to simply fix it this way, by disabling irqs while it loads
> > the firmware?
>
> I would say to just disable IRQs while loading firmware. Almost every
> server I maintain has some vendor driver which generates a "many lost
> ticks!" message on load. As long as it's only done at module load
> time it should be fine.
For anything ~10s or more, you'll probably also need to call the timer
update function to prevent soft lockup warning being generated.
> Of course the best solution is to just get the driver into mainline.
>
> Lee
--
Daniel J Blueman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists