lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:16:47 +0100
From:	"Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To:	"Matthew Fredrickson" <creslin@...ium.com>
Cc:	"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Device Driver Etiquette

On 1 Jun, 19:40, "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Matthew Fredrickson <creslin@...ium.com> wrote:
>
> > is it acceptable (although
> > not nice) to simply fix it this way, by disabling irqs while it loads
> > the firmware?
>
> I would say to just disable IRQs while loading firmware.  Almost every
> server I maintain has some vendor driver which generates a "many lost
> ticks!" message on load.  As long as it's only done at module load
> time it should be fine.

For anything ~10s or more, you'll probably also need to call the timer
update function to prevent soft lockup warning being generated.

> Of course the best solution is to just get the driver into mainline.
>
> Lee
-- 
Daniel J Blueman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ