lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070602124255.GA10119@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jun 2007 14:42:55 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	jakub@...hat.com, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	daplas@...il.com
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Section mismatches in drivers/video/console/promcon

Building a kernel for sparc64 defconfig gave me following warnings:
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xb788): Section mismatch: reference to .init.data:promfont_unitable (between 'promcon_init_unimap' and 'promcon_init')
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xb790): Section mismatch: reference to .init.data:promfont_unitable (between 'promcon_init_unimap' and 'promcon_init')
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xb794): Section mismatch: reference to .init.data:promfont_unicount (between 'promcon_init_unimap' and 'promcon_init')
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xb798): Section mismatch: reference to .init.data:promfont_unicount (between 'promcon_init_unimap' and 'promcon_init')

The warnings happens because the function: promcon_init_unimap()
references promfont_unitable and promfont_unicount which are marked
__initdata by the conmakehash command in the drivers/video/console/Makefile

The function promcon_init_unimap() are referenced in two places:
1) In prom_con_init() which is marked __init => no problem.
2) In promcon_init() which is not marked __init => warning.
The actual code is here:
	if (!promcon_uni_pagedir[0] && p) {
		promcon_init_unimap(conp);
	}

I could not from the code judge if promcon_init_unimap is really
only used during early init or this is a bug.
If promcon_init_unimap() is only used during early init it
should be marked __init_refok (with a proper comment)
to silence the warning.

A few people in to: that I hope can help out (thanks to git blame)...

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ