[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070602144348.GD5500@stusta.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:43:48 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Conditionals for development tests and output
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:17:53PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This introduces
>
> CONFIG_DEVELKERNEL
>
> If CONFIG_DEVELKERNEL is set then this is a development kernel.
> Otherwise the kernel to be built is a a production kernel.
>...
I have two problems with your patch:
First, there will be a slub/slab specific mechanism for debug code
controlled by a parameter in the Makefile plus the common
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL approach used by most other debug options.
We need one approach for all options.
And your approach could easily result in code paths never tested in
-mm or -rc kernels exploding in the actual release.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists