[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070602194321.GB31754@jm.kir.nu>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:43:22 -0700
From: Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
neilb@...e.de, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiple xor_block() functions
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:57:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> include/linux/raid/xor.h:extern void xor_block(unsigned int count, unsigned int bytes, void **ptr);
> drivers/md/xor.c:xor_block(unsigned int count, unsigned int bytes, void **ptr)
> drivers/md/xor.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_block);
>
> and
>
> net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_ccmp.c:static inline void xor_block(u8 * b, u8 * a, size_t len)
>
>
> At least one of them has to be renamed.
Why? Not that I would really mind renaming one of these, but I don't see
a good reason for it. ieee80211_crypt_ccmp.c should not include
linux/raid/xor.h and the xor_block() in CCMP code is a static inline
function that should not show up outside the scope of this file. Do we
have some magic that makes exported symbols pollute name space for
inlined helper functions?
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists