linux-kernel - Re: multiple xor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:43:22 -0700
From:	Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	neilb@...e.de, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiple xor_block() functions

On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:57:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> include/linux/raid/xor.h:extern void xor_block(unsigned int count, unsigned int bytes, void **ptr);
> drivers/md/xor.c:xor_block(unsigned int count, unsigned int bytes, void **ptr)
> drivers/md/xor.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_block);
> 
> and
> 
> net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_ccmp.c:static inline void xor_block(u8 * b, u8 * a, size_t len)
> 
> 
> At least one of them has to be renamed.

Why? Not that I would really mind renaming one of these, but I don't see
a good reason for it. ieee80211_crypt_ccmp.c should not include
linux/raid/xor.h and the xor_block() in CCMP code is a static inline
function that should not show up outside the scope of this file. Do we
have some magic that makes exported symbols pollute name space for
inlined helper functions?

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/