lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2007 19:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0)



On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>  
> -	if (!x)
> +	if (x <= ZERO_SIZE_PTR)
>  		return;

Btw, this is _not_ safe.

A number of gcc versions have done signed arithmetic on pointers. It's 
insane and stupid, but it happens, and it so happens to work on 
architectures where the point where the sign changes over is not a valid 
pointer area.

On x86, doing signed arithmetic on pointers is a clear and unambiguous 
_bug_ (because a C object really _can_ start in "positive" space and end 
in "negative" pointer space), but I think some gcc versions did it there 
too.

On some other architectures, like x86-64, the virtual memory around the 
magic switch-over point is not mappable, so a C object cannot validly 
straddle the area where positive overflows into negative, and as such a 
compiler _could_ consider pointers to be signed (although I really don't 
see the point).

So when I suggested the uglier

	if ((unsigned long)x <= 16)
		return;

I really did mean to use that ugly cast.. Yours is prettier, but sadly, 
yours is simply not safe: a signed comparison might end up making _all_ 
kernel pointers trigger that test.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ