[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070602051005.GQ943@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 07:10:06 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Compact Flash performance...
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:43:46PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Mark Lord wrote:
> >>Some cards may perform better when their "memory" interface is used
> >>instead of the "I/O" interface, or vice-versa. I'm not sure which
> >>of the two methods was selected by libata (probably the "memory"
> >>interface).
> >
> >I am very CF-ignorant. How does libata select a memory or I/O interface
> >on a CF device?
>
> Right. Usually we cannot select them, as it's the wires between
> the ATA chipset (motherboard) and the CFCARD that determine this.
CF cards support 3 modes (MEM, I/O and True IDE), and neither MEM nor I/O
modes can talk IDE. Most often, the PIN 9 is simply shorted to the ground
at the connector to set the card in True IDE mode, which makes it emulate
a standard IDE disk.
Cheers,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists