[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706032358.44870.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:58:43 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...l.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>,
CaT <cat@....com.au>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
David Weinehall <tao@....umu.se>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Dongjun Shin <djshin90@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@...reenet.org>,
Ulisses Furquim <ulissesf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 06/18] fs/logfs/compr.c
On Sunday 03 June 2007, Jörn Engel wrote:
> +#define COMPR_LEVEL 3
> +
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(compr_mutex);
> +static struct z_stream_s stream;
Is there a particular reason to choose '3' as the only compression
level? Should this perhaps be a per-superblock option instead?
Also, I thought I saw discussion about making the mutex and
stream per-superblock, but don't remember if the idea was discarded.
If it was, you might want to add it to the won't-happen list.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists