[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070603222439.GA16422@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:24:39 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: Define CONFIG_BOUNCE to avoid useless inclusion of bounce buffer logic.
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Also there is the problem that some drivers use ZONE_DMA allocations
> > because their device can only generate addresses below some limit, but
> > on a platform with an IOMMU there is in fact no restriction on what
> > memory the device can access.
>
> That problem is to some extend addressed by switching ZONE_DMA off which
> results in GFP_DMA becoming meaningless. And if GFP_DMA and ZONE_DMA is
> gone from a platform then the MAX_DMA_ADDRESS inconsistencies are solved
> since the cause of the inconsistencies has evaporated.
Suffice it to say then that with this approach ARM will _never_ be able
to have ZONE_DMA turned off, even on platforms where there are no DMA
restrictions. I guess that's something we'll just have to live with.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists