[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF7723C01B.9DD0E9DC-ONC12572F0.0040CA22-C12572F0.0042AC08@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:09:47 +0200
From: Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Roscher <ossrosch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ossthema@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Thomas Q Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>,
tklein@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ehea: Receive SKB Aggregation
Christoph Hellwig wrote on 31.05.2007 15:41:18:
> I'm still very unhappy with having all this in various drivers. There's
> a lot of code that can be turned into generic library functions, and even
> more code that could be made generic with some amount of refactoring.
Yes, we'd also prefer to use a generic function, but we first would want to
get
some "real world" experience how our driver behaves with LRO to be even
able to
define requirements for such a generic function. A lot of this is tied into
pathlengths,
caching, and why does that help compared to a different TCP receive side
processing?
In a perfect world we shouldn't see a diffference if this is enabled or
not,
but measurements indicate something completely different at 10gbit.
Gruss / Regards
Christoph Raisch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists