[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46640C30.9050808@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:57:20 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Korb <ml@...na.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ide: ide-generic, add another device exception
Sergei Shtylyov napsal(a):
> Hello.
>
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/generic.c b/drivers/ide/pci/generic.c
>> index f2c5a14..0d51a11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ide/pci/generic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/generic.c
>> @@ -198,32 +198,41 @@ static ide_pci_device_t generic_chipsets[]
>> __devinitdata = {
>> static int __devinit generic_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, const
>> struct pci_device_id *id)
>> {
>> ide_pci_device_t *d = &generic_chipsets[id->driver_data];
>> - u16 command;
>> int ret = -ENODEV;
>>
>> /* Don't use the generic entry unless instructed to do so */
>> if (id->driver_data == 0 && ide_generic_all == 0)
>> goto out;
>>
>> - if (dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_UMC &&
>> - dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_UMC_UM8886A &&
>> - (!(PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) & 1)))
>> - goto out; /* UM8886A/BF pair */
>> -
>> - if (dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_OPTI &&
>> - dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_OPTI_82C558 &&
>> - (!(PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) & 1)))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> - if (dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON) {
>> - if (dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_JMICRON_JMB368 &&
>> PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) != 1)
>> + switch (dev->vendor) {
>> + case PCI_VENDOR_ID_UMC:
>> + if (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_UMC_UM8886A &&
>> + !(PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) & 1))
>> + goto out; /* UM8886A/BF pair */
>> + break;
>> + case PCI_VENDOR_ID_OPTI:
>> + if (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_OPTI_82C558 &&
>> + !(PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) & 1))
>> + goto out;
>> + break;
>> + case PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON:
>> + if (dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_JMICRON_JMB368 &&
>> + PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) != 1)
>> + goto out;
>> + break;
>> + case PCI_VENDOR_ID_NS:
>> + if (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_NS_87410 &&
>> + (dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE)
>> goto out;
>> + break;
>> }
>
> Could you intend the if() conditions carried to another line the way
> they were intended before?
I could, if you tell me the reason.
regards,
--
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists