[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706040916090.23191@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
jeremy@...p.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0)
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > They are different instances which happen to have the same length (zero).
>
> On 6/2/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> > I guess one could use the slab allocators as a type of reservation
> > ticket generator with zero sized objects. Hmmm.... But is that really a
> > useful thing to do?
>
> Can someone remind me why we can't do what mm/slab.c does for
> zero-size allocations in slub too?
We are doing that right now. The problem is that people keep storing stuff
in memory allocated with kmalloc(0).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists