[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46644F57.80005@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:43:51 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add rules for goto labels
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 4 2007 10:27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Seconded. All my code contains the goto label in the first column.
>>>
>>> IMO any other goto label indentation is silly, because it obscures the
>>> goto label within the code block.
>> I would have to disagree with this. IMNSHO, a goto label is like a case
>> label, and they should be treated the same way.
>
> But gotos are special. ("Evil" minus the "it's good for unrolling in case of an
> error" case).
>
So?
You still want them to be associated with the level the bailout happens at.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists