[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180939188.4404.5.camel@chaos>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:39:48 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:26 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > Is there any other strange behavior of the high res enabled kernel than
> > the b44 problem ?
>
> I didn't notice anything in the past (as I wrote). But today I did some tests
> for an updated version of the p54 mac80211 wlan driver and I noticed exactly
> the same problem:
>
> when booting with highres=off everything is fine.
> But when I boot an highres enabled kernel and I do the iperf-test with the p54
> driver, my systems becomes unresponsive during the test. It seems to be
> exactly the same problem I have with the b44 driver.
> So this might not be a bug in the b44 code but a bug somewhere in the linux
> networking code.
>
> I did the test with an 2.6.22-rc3-git4 kernel and the p54 driver built
> external as module.
Can you look at iperf to figure out, whether it does some weird timer
stuff (high frequency interval timer or such) ? Either check the code or
strace it.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists