[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706041201210.24550@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __get_free_pages: can GFP_DMA omit GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC?
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> all right, then some of those __get_free_pages() calls would translate
> to calls of the form __get_dma_pages(0, ...) -- is that what you're
> saying? or would it be equivalent and preferable to put GFP_ATOMIC in
> there just so it looks not so weird?
Put GFP_ATOMIC in there so that it does not look weird.
GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH == GFP_NOWAIT
So these should have GFP_NOWAIT as far as I can tell?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists