[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020706041213x1d241794u98e9b3ca29865033@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:13:30 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0)
Hi Christoph,
On 6/4/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> /*
> - * We should return 0 if size == 0 (which would result in the
> - * kmalloc caller to get NULL) but we use the smallest object
> - * here for legacy reasons. Just issue a warning so that
> - * we can discover locations where we do 0 sized allocations.
> + * The behavior for zero sized allocs changes. We no longer
> + * allocate memory but return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> + * WARN so that people can review and fix their code.
> */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0);
I thought the whole point of this patch was to get rid of the WARN_ON
as you will get a nice oops if you dereference the pointer?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists