[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070604200606.GA5500@stusta.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:06:06 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/5] LZO and swap write failure patches for -mm
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:56:46PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com> wrote:
>...
>> The zlib code isn't kernel style and is arguably bloated, perhaps we
>> should remove that?
>
> I don't know - I don't use zlib.
> We can make LZO cleaner and perhaps faster. This will be good.
>...
"cleaner" = much harder to upgrade to new upstream LZO versions -> bad
"perhaps faster" = different from the well-known original code and
might again contain new bugs -> bad
"perhaps faster" = if we fork LZO and actually get it faster, all the
other LZO users will not benefit -> bad
zlib and LZO are special because they are maintained userspace code
imported into the kernel.
> Regards,
> Nitin
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists