[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070604215841.GK20299@havoc.gtf.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:58:41 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ATA]: Don't allow to enable this for SPARC64 without PCI.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:27:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:09:52 -0400
>
> > Um, this was NAK'd:
> >
> > libata uses generic DMA and generic struct device. Neither of which
> > are specific to SPARC64 or PCI.
> >
> > Did you read the code?
> > Did you read the thread on which you were CC'd?
> > Did you see the NAKs from me and Alan (and others)?
>
> It went in before any of you replied, to be fair.
Sounds like we should taunt Linus for being slow then ;) ;)
> I'm willing to fix this in other ways, but there is simply
> no hardware that's going to work in that kind of configuration
> (non-PCI) on sparc64 so building it in that state is going to
> be purely for the purposes of intellectual curiosity :-)
Should be easy enough to add dma_xxx wrappers that do nothing but
return an error.
As long as this change is _temporary_, I'm happy.
As you saw from my reply, apply a driver fix for a platform problem
makes me twitch in a big way... :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists