[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070605114102.GG10199@frankl.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:41:02 -0700
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : modified powerpc files
David,
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:40:53AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > include/asm-powerpc/thread_info.h:
> > - add TIF_PERFMON which is used for PMU context switching in __switch_to()
> >
>
> You mean TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW and TIF_PERFMON_WORK.
>
Yes.
> > --- linux-2.6.22.base/include/asm-powerpc/thread_info.h 2007-05-29 03:20:21.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.22/include/asm-powerpc/thread_info.h 2007-05-29 03:24:14.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -112,16 +112,18 @@ static inline struct thread_info *curren
> > #define TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG 3 /* true if poll_idle() is polling
> > TIF_NEED_RESCHED */
> > #define TIF_32BIT 4 /* 32 bit binary */
> > -#define TIF_RUNLATCH 5 /* Is the runlatch enabled? */
> > -#define TIF_ABI_PENDING 6 /* 32/64 bit switch needed */
> > +#define TIF_PERFMON_WORK 5 /* work for pfm_handle_work() */
> > +#define TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW 6 /* perfmon needs ctxsw calls */
> > #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 7 /* syscall auditing active */
> > #define TIF_SINGLESTEP 8 /* singlestepping active */
> > #define TIF_MEMDIE 9
> > #define TIF_SECCOMP 10 /* secure computing */
> > #define TIF_RESTOREALL 11 /* Restore all regs (implies NOERROR) */
> > -#define TIF_NOERROR 14 /* Force successful syscall return */
> > -#define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 15 /* Restore signal mask in do_signal */
> > -#define TIF_FREEZE 16 /* Freezing for suspend */
> > +#define TIF_NOERROR 12 /* Force successful syscall return */
> > +#define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 13 /* Restore signal mask in do_signal */
> > +#define TIF_FREEZE 14 /* Freezing for suspend */
> > +#define TIF_RUNLATCH 15 /* Is the runlatch enabled? */
> > +#define TIF_ABI_PENDING 16 /* 32/64 bit switch needed */
> >
> > /* as above, but as bit values */
> > #define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE (1<<TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)
> > @@ -129,8 +131,8 @@ static inline struct thread_info *curren
> > #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1<<TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> > #define _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG (1<<TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG)
> > #define _TIF_32BIT (1<<TIF_32BIT)
> > -#define _TIF_RUNLATCH (1<<TIF_RUNLATCH)
> > -#define _TIF_ABI_PENDING (1<<TIF_ABI_PENDING)
> > +#define _TIF_PERFMON_WORK (1<<TIF_PERFMON_WORK)
> > +#define _TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW (1<<TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW)
> > #define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT (1<<TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT)
> > #define _TIF_SINGLESTEP (1<<TIF_SINGLESTEP)
> > #define _TIF_SECCOMP (1<<TIF_SECCOMP)
> > @@ -138,10 +140,14 @@ static inline struct thread_info *curren
> > #define _TIF_NOERROR (1<<TIF_NOERROR)
> > #define _TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK (1<<TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK)
> > #define _TIF_FREEZE (1<<TIF_FREEZE)
> > +#define _TIF_RUNLATCH (1<<TIF_RUNLATCH)
> > +#define _TIF_ABI_PENDING (1<<TIF_ABI_PENDING)
> > #define _TIF_SYSCALL_T_OR_A (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE|_TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT|_TIF_SECCOMP)
> > +#define _TIF_PERFMON_WORK (1<<TIF_PERFMON_WORK)
> > +#define _TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW (1<<TIF_PERFMON_CTXSW)
> >
> > -#define _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK ( _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
> > - _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK)
> > +#define _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK (_TIF_SIGPENDING | \
> > + _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK| _TIF_PERFMON_WORK)
> > #define _TIF_PERSYSCALL_MASK (_TIF_RESTOREALL|_TIF_NOERROR)
>
> No need to move _TIF_RUNLATCH or _TIF_ABI_PENDING.
>
Well, that was done by IBM to simplify the code in entry_64.S dealing with _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK
would not have to add extra instructions to load the constant, i.e., it had to fit within the 16
low order bits.
> >
> > /* Bits in local_flags */
> > diff --exclude=.git -urp linux-2.6.22.base/include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h linux-2.6.22/include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h
> > --- linux-2.6.22.base/include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h 2007-05-29 03:17:57.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.22/include/asm-powerpc/unistd.h 2007-05-29 03:24:14.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -330,10 +330,22 @@
> > #define __NR_signalfd 305
> > #define __NR_timerfd 306
> > #define __NR_eventfd 307
> > +#define __NR_pfm_create_context 308
> > +#define __NR_pfm_write_pmcs (__NR_pfm_create_context+1)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_write_pmds (__NR_pfm_create_context+2)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_read_pmds (__NR_pfm_create_context+3)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_load_context (__NR_pfm_create_context+4)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_start (__NR_pfm_create_context+5)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_stop (__NR_pfm_create_context+6)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_restart (__NR_pfm_create_context+7)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_create_evtsets (__NR_pfm_create_context+8)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_getinfo_evtsets (__NR_pfm_create_context+9)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_delete_evtsets (__NR_pfm_create_context+10)
> > +#define __NR_pfm_unload_context (__NR_pfm_create_context+11)
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#define __NR_syscalls 308
> > +#define __NR_syscalls 319
> >
>
> The highest numbered syscall, __NR_pfm_create_context+11, is 319 and
> __NR_syscalls is set to the same, which is wrong.
>
You mean, it is off by one, right? Should be 320, then.
Thanks for your feedback.
--
-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists