linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lguest-fix-divide-error-implement-sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070605090714.22bfcfd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:07:14 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lguest-fix-divide-error-implement-sched_clock

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:24:52 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:

> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:11, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 12:01 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > But TSC is a "required feature", so "cpu_has_tsc" is always true.
> > >
> > > Hmm? It isn't. What makes you think so?
> >
> > Interestingly it seems to be only in -mm.
> 
> If it is then it doesn't come out of my tree. Also sounds broken to me.
> The required bits are only for features needed by the compiler's generated
> code where not having them could cause an early crash.
> 

This?

-#define REQUIRED_MASK1 (NEED_PAE|NEED_CMOV|NEED_CMPXCHG64)
+#define REQUIRED_MASK0 (NEED_FPU|NEED_TSC|NEED_PAE|NEED_CMOV|NEED_CX8)

Came in via git-newsetup
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/