[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070605135655.a58f0b41.jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:56:55 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: set the response bitmask for an EXCLUSIVE CREATE
RFC 3530 says:
If the server uses an attribute to store the exclusive
create verifier, it will signify which attribute by setting the
appropriate bit in the attribute mask that is returned in the
results.
Linux uses the atime and mtime to store the verifier, but sends a zeroed out
bitmask back to the client. This patch makes sure that we set the correct
bits in the bitmask in this situation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 8522729..da20674 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -99,7 +99,15 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_o
status = nfsd_create_v3(rqstp, current_fh, open->op_fname.data,
open->op_fname.len, &open->op_iattr,
&resfh, open->op_createmode,
- (u32 *)open->op_verf.data, &open->op_truncate, &created);
+ (u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
+ &open->op_truncate, &created);
+
+ /* If we ever decide to use different attrs to store the
+ * verifier in nfsd_create_v3, then we'll need to change this
+ */
+ if (open->op_createmode == NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE && status == 0)
+ open->op_bmval[1] |= (FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS |
+ FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_MODIFY);
} else {
status = nfsd_lookup(rqstp, current_fh,
open->op_fname.data, open->op_fname.len, &resfh);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists