[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4665AD01.6030003@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:35:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problems (a bug?) with UINT_MAX from kernel.h
Richard Purdie wrote:
> The kernel uses UINT_MAX defined from kernel.h in a variety of places.
>
> While looking at the behaviour of the LZO code, I noticed it seemed to
> think an int was 8 bytes large on my 32 bit i386 machine. It isn't but
> why did it think that?
>
> kernel.h says:
>
> #define INT_MAX ((int)(~0U>>1))
> #define INT_MIN (-INT_MAX - 1)
> #define UINT_MAX (~0U)
> #define LONG_MAX ((long)(~0UL>>1))
> #define LONG_MIN (-LONG_MAX - 1)
> #define ULONG_MAX (~0UL)
> #define LLONG_MAX ((long long)(~0ULL>>1))
> #define LLONG_MIN (-LLONG_MAX - 1)
> #define ULLONG_MAX (~0ULL)
>
> If I try to compile the code fragment below, I see the error:
>
> #define UINT_MAX (~0U)
> #if (0xffffffffffffffff == UINT_MAX)
> #error argh
> #endif
>
> I've tested this on several systems with a variety of gcc versions with
> the same result. I've tried various other ways of testing this all with
> the same conclusion, UINT_MAX is wrong.
>
C99 states that all arithmetic in the preprocessor is done in
(u)intmax_t, regardless of prefixes or suffixes.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists