[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0706051658170.23379@d.namei>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:00:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>, drepper@...hat.com,
roland@...hat.com, arjan@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, chrisw@...hat.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
sgrubb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Protection for exploiting null dereference using mmap
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
> +extern int mmap_protect_memory;
This should be an unsigned long.
I wonder if the default should be for this value to be zero (i.e. preserve
existing behavior). It could break binaries, albeit potentially insecure
ones.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists