[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181077986.4404.165.camel@chaos>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:13:06 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] muptiple bugs in PI futexes
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 01:00 +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > We actually need to do something about this, as we might loop for ever
> > there. The robust cleanup code can fail (e.g. due to list corruption)
> > and we would see exit_state != 0 and the OWNER_DIED bit would never be
> > set, so we are stuck in a busy loop.
>
> Yes...
>
> It is possible to take read_lock(&tasklist_lock) before:
We really want to avoid the tasklist_lock at all. It's not trivial, but
I think it's doable. I send you a patch to test tomorrow morning when my
brain recovered from looking at that code :)
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists