linux-kernel - Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070605214613.GB21578@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:46:13 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc:	art@...ltd.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>  Hi,
> 
>  On 24/05/07, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:00:58PM -0500, art@...ltd.com wrote:
> > >  greg
> > >
> > >  and part of /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules
> > >
> > >  ...
> > >  ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> > >  SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> > >
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4100C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20 (C5101A) | Hewlett-Packard Photosmart 
> > S20xi
> > >  (C7150A)
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0102", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cxi |
> > >  Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cse
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0105", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6250C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0201", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0205", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4300c
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0305", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 5200C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0401", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3400c
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0405", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2100C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0505", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6300C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6350C |
> > >  Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6390C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0601", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2200C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0605", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >
> > >  ...
> > >  # Dell 1600n
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="413c", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5250", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >
> > >  LABEL="libsane_rules_end"
> >
> >
> > I don't see anything odd there at all.
> >
> > Can you run 'git bisect' to try to narrow down to the patch that caused
> > the problem?
> 
>  Any progress with this bug?

I haven't heard back from Art, and nothing looks wrong in the rules file
above...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/