[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.99.0706051608090.16201@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
clameter@...ulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] cpusets: do not allow TIF_MEMDIE tasks to allocate
globally
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I'm a little surprised at this suggested change -- I'd have thought
> that it was a good idea to let tasks marked for extinction get memory
> anywhere, as they were going to use that memory to exit, and free up
> lots more memory.
>
The intended purpose of TIF_MEMDIE was to allocate pages without being
bound by the watermarks so that they have access to memory reserves on the
per-zone level. If the cpuset doesn't have access to a zone, whether it's
memory reserve or not, it shouldn't allocate there.
> I'm pretty sure we have this same policy in other places in the
> kernel, besides cpusets. Did you intend to change them too?
>
You'd have to cite them first.
> If a MEMDIE task is taking enough memory to OOM other tasks anywhere
> in the system, then doesn't that mean your entire system was in deep
> yogurt, and we're just haggling over who to blame for the upcoming
> crash?
>
No, it means that it can allocate anywhere based on the zonelist ordering
and then can OOM a very small exclusive cpuset that would never have had
any memory pressure if it wasn't violated.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists