[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070605165538.0a3ce6fe.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:55:38 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
clameter@...ulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] cpusets: do not allow TIF_MEMDIE tasks to allocate
globally
> If that fails, we can't allocate elsewhere because then we have taken
> exclusive memory from other applications and is contrary to the definition
> of mem_exclusive.
Well, I can't speak to the 'real' meaning of TIF_MEMDIE with authority,
but I can speak to the meaning of cpuset flags.
The mem_exclusive flag doesn't mean this.
It means that you cannot overlap the memory of a sibling cpuset.
You will, necessarily, still overlap the memory of your ancestor cpusets.
Whether or not you make any use of the mem_exclusive flag, you still
get the same (limited) guarantees of memory usage -- namely that your
memory won't be used by tasks in non-overlapping cpusets, with some
exceptions, such as:
1) memory handed out to interrupt code,
2) memory handed out for GFP_ATOMIC requests, and
3) tasks marked PF_EXITING -- will soon free up memory
Tasks in cpusets ancestor to your tasks cpuset can always, easily,
use memory on the same nodes your task is on.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists