linux-kernel - Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:27:40 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0)

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0) V3
> 
> Instead of returning the smallest available object return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> 
> A ZERO_SIZE_PTR can be legitimately used as an object pointer as long
> as it is not deferenced. The dereference of ZERO_SIZE_PTR causes a
> distinctive fault.
> kfree can handle a ZERO_SIZE_PTR in the same way as NULL.

FWIW, I am happy :-). We should add a comment to kmalloc() that we 
return non-unique pointers for zero-length allocations though.

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/