linux-kernel - Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:01:30 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14


* Li Yu <raise.sail@...il.com> wrote:

> Eh, I wrong again~ I even took an experiment in last week end, this 
> idea is really bad! ;(
> 
> I think the most inner of source of my wrong again and again is 
> misunderstanding virtual time. For more better understanding this, I 
> try to write one python script to simulate CFS behavior. However, It 
> can not implement the fairness as I want. I really confuse here.
> 
> Would you like help me point out what's wrong in it? Any suggestion is 
> welcome. Thanks in advanced.

sorry, my python-fu is really, really weak. All i can give you at the 
moment is the in-kernel implementation of CFS :-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/