[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:00:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> wrote:
> [ This is 2.6.22 material ]
>
> Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
> Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
> --
> arch/um/defconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/arch/um/defconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-mm.orig/arch/um/defconfig 2007-06-05 12:18:35.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.21-mm/arch/um/defconfig 2007-06-05 12:19:12.000000000 -0400
> @@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ CONFIG_MCONSOLE=y
> # CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is not set
> CONFIG_NEST_LEVEL=0
> # CONFIG_HIGHMEM is not set
> -CONFIG_KERNEL_STACK_ORDER=0
> CONFIG_UML_REAL_TIME_CLOCK=y
>
That means the Kconfig rules are wrong, surely?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists