[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:01:59 +1000
From: Russell Coker <russell@...er.com.au>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>, drepper@...hat.com,
roland@...hat.com, arjan@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jmorris@...ei.org, chrisw@...hat.com,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, sgrubb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Protection for exploiting null dereference using mmap
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 06:34, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote:
> This patch uses a new SELinux security class "memprotect." Policy
> already contains a number of allow rules like a_t self:process *
> (unconfined_t being one of them) which mean that putting this check in
> the process class (its best current fit) would make it useless as all
I think it would be best to use the process class and change the "*" rules to
~{ memprotect }.
--
russell@...er.com.au
http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog
http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists