[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466708D8.90208@student.ltu.se>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:19:52 +0200
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>
Subject: Re: generic bool and sparse errors?
Kok, Auke wrote:
>
> I'm experimenting with using the generic bool type and using sparse I
> get tons of these messages:
>
> warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different signedness)
> expected bool [unsigned] [usertype] *[unsigned] success
> got bool *<noident>
>
> I'm not really worried about this, I assume that sparse hasn't caught
> up with what bool really means, but perhaps this can be looked into by
> someone who knows sparse well. The warnings don't really add up and
> with more people switching to use the generic bool this may beceome
> unwanted.
Actually, I am "assigned" to that. :)
Just out of curiousity, where do you see those messages? In the log for
allyesconfig on i386 I only found ntfs/super.c with similar output.
>
> alternatively we might need to reconsider the `typedef _Bool bool;`
> declaration and force it to be unsigned. I'm not sure what to think of
> that.
I do not see how that would make any sense.
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists