[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: drepper@...hat.com
Cc: davidel@...ilserver.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, dada1@...mosbay.com
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:57:41 -0700
> I would strongly argue that any change we're doing in this area at
> userlevel would involve a new interface. Programs also need new
> definitions from headers files. This means a recent enough glibc will
> be needed in any case. Unless programs use their own definitions in
> which case they might as well use the syscall() function.
To be honest, after reading Alan's response a few moments ago
I'm growing in favor of his suggestions and that all of these
new system calls perhaps really are overkill.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists