[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706070442530.6253@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 05:04:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: trying to summarize/organize the page allocation routines
not surprisingly, there's a bit of chaos in the variety of page
allocation routines that can be used to do equivalent things.
just related to the previously-discussed DMA stuff, there are the
variations:
* page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
* (void *)__get_free_pages(__GFP_DMA,...
* __get_dma_pages(...)
so you can use the type flag "GFP_DMA", or the modifier flag
"__GFP_DMA", or call __get_dma_pages() directly. so is there a
consensus on what a uniform usage should be? (i think it's already
agreed that __get_dma_pages() can be tossed.) but there's more.
while get_zeroed_page() exists to allocate a single zero-filled page
and return its logical address, there's a number of calls to
__get_free_page that use an action modifier of __GFP_ZERO that
could be rewritten as get_zeroed_page(), no?
and if get_zeroed_page() is a useful shortcut, why not an equivalent
get_zeroed_pages() for consistency with alloc_page/alloc_pages and
__get_free_page/__get_free_pages?
a single piece of documentation explaining stuff like this would be
handy, as well as a consistent usage of all of the above.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists